港教大-法学-LAW6001全球數字化的法律、政策與治理

Ref

LAW6001全球數字化的法律、政策與治理

主讲：Andrew 黄岳博士

上课地址：E-P-02M
上课时间：17:30 - 20:20 (Friday) 周五

黄岳博士，2020年毕业于耶鲁大学法学院，获司法科学博士（J.S.D.）学位；2017年毕业于香港大学法律学院，获法学博士（Ph.D）学位。主要研究领域为环境和能源法、国际投资法及国家安全法。曾任耶鲁大学中国法律中心研究员，科文顿柏灵律师事务所华盛顿办公室律师，并曾在耶鲁大学、斯坦佛大学任教。在担任律师和研究员期间，曾和美国多位前政府高级官员及拜登政府高级官员进行深入工作合作和交流，并多次受邀为美国、英国、新加坡律师讲授中国法和比较法课程。

Ref

第一节课：數碼化浪潮下的法律新坐標


通过网盘分享的文件：第一节课-09月12日.zip
链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1GJlDfW8S_1hJT1qY1cD0qg 提取码: 6vxj

Ref

第二节课：

课前作业：
Dear all,

For Week 2 of LAW6001: The Law, Policy and Governance in Global Digitization, we will explore Legal Frameworks for Digital Technologies. Please read all the materials listed below—there are no recommended readings this week, so everything uploaded is required.

📘 Articles

Reed, C. (2012). Taking Sides on Technology Neutrality. SCRIPTed, 4(3), 263–284.
Koops, B.J. (2006). Should ICT Regulation be Technology-Neutral? Computer Law and Security Review, 22(1), 1–18.
Bradford, A. (2012). The Brussels Effect. Northwestern University Law Review, 107(1), 1–68.
⚖️ Key Cases

Google Spain SL v. Mario Costeja González (2014) CJEU C-131/12
Schrems II (2020) CJEU C-311/18
Facebook v. Bundeskartellamt (2019) German Federal Court of Justice KVR 69/19
Carpenter v. United States (2018) US Supreme Court 585 U.S.
Riley v. California (2014) US Supreme Court 573 U.S. 373
Jones v. United States (2012) US Supreme Court 565 U.S. 400
I encourage you to use all available methods to support your understanding—note-taking, digital tools, and especially group study, which often brings valuable perspectives and deeper insight.

We will discuss these readings in class, and your preparation will directly shape the quality of our dialogue.

Happy reading, strong thinking,

Andrew

课堂：

相关资料：
链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/17Anx200zRNzNPz2Ev8dH4g 提取码: rkf1

Ref

第三节课：

课前作业：
For Week 3, our topic is Policy Development in the Digital Era, with a focus on the Constitutional and Administrative Law Framework.

Instead of case studies, which we’ll explore together during class discussions, please concentrate on the following three essential papers:

Howlett, M. & Mukherjee, I. (2018) – Policy Design: From Tools to Patches. Canadian Public Policy, 44(4), 267–284
Janssen, M. & Helbig, N. (2018) – Innovating and Changing the Policy-Cycle: Policy-Makers Be Prepared! Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S99–S105
Coglianese, C. & Lehr, D. (2019) – Transparency and Algorithmic Governance. Administrative Law Review, 71(1), 1–56
Please make sure to complete them before class, as they will form the foundation for our discussions.

Your preparation will help us dive deeper and make the most of our time together.

Ref

第三节课：

时间：9月26日晚上5点30-7点30
主讲：黄教授

链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1stuCvrLRdFS5Cm40Sq751g 提取码: tngs

Ref

第四节课：
课前阅读：

Please read the following article and two case studies. Our upcoming discussion will focus on digital governance.

Article: Pohle, J. & Thiel, T. (2020). "Digital Sovereignty." Internet Policy Review, 9(4). [Available: Open Access]

• Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme (2006) US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (Jurisdictional conflicts)
• Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc. (2017) Supreme Court of Canada SCC 34 (Global injunctions)
  

附件是原文与机翻译文

Ref

第四节课：
10月3日
主讲人：黄岳教授

链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1mlice6d7s7bVoRjLKXM5sQ 提取码: 4p46

作业：

tiktok有什么问题还没解决
有什么办法可以解决

如果国家之间一定要解决国家司法主权之间的冲突，要找到全球可以接受的方法

这是期末作业，算分的。

Ref

第五节课课前

Dear all,

As we prepare for our upcoming session on algorithmic governance and digital due process, please ensure you have completed the following readings:

Core Article
Citron, D.K. & Pasquale, F. (2014). “The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions.” Washington Law Review, 89(1), 1–33. Available via the Washington Law Review platform.
Key Cases for Examination
State v. Loomis (2016), Wisconsin Supreme Court, 881 N.W.2d 749
Bollaert v. Superior Court (2017), California Court of Appeal
Patel v. Facebook (2021), U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
All materials have been uploaded to moodle.

Warm regards,

Andrew